7799精品视频天天在看,日韩一区二区三区灯红酒绿,国产xxxxx在线观看,在线911精品亚洲

「反思當(dāng)代中國(guó)的儒家復(fù)興：經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究的視角」

研討會(huì)征稿啟事

在過(guò)去的約半個(gè)世紀(jì)，儒家的現(xiàn)代命運(yùn)正在悄然發(fā)生著逆轉(zhuǎn)性變化。一方面，當(dāng)余英時(shí)(1998)先生在1980年代以“游魂說(shuō)”概述儒家的現(xiàn)代處境時(shí)，其冷靜而嚴(yán)酷的筆觸讓我們不得不承認(rèn)儒家與現(xiàn)實(shí)生活世界存在著巨大斷裂。事實(shí)上，自二十世紀(jì)初以來(lái)，儒家經(jīng)歷了漫長(zhǎng)而持久的知識(shí)化重構(gòu)過(guò)程，從一個(gè)涉及政治、社會(huì)、教育、文化和心靈的完備綜合體窄化為一個(gè)純粹學(xué)理性、理論性的知識(shí)形態(tài)，從而與社會(huì)實(shí)踐和人倫日用發(fā)生嚴(yán)重脫離，無(wú)法再為人類(lèi)生活提供日常教化和精神指導(dǎo)。但另一方面，進(jìn)入二十一世紀(jì)以后，儒家日益呈現(xiàn)出一種與知識(shí)化取向相反的趨勢(shì)——它逸出大學(xué)的學(xué)科建制和學(xué)術(shù)邊界，向民間社會(huì)滲透，在社會(huì)組織和大眾領(lǐng)域扎下根基，成為越來(lái)越多個(gè)體安身立命的精神源泉。當(dāng)前的儒家復(fù)興展現(xiàn)出明顯的草根性、大眾性和社會(huì)性，儒家行動(dòng)者和民間團(tuán)體成為儒家恢復(fù)生命力、重振精神性影響、重啟日常人生化的主力之一。有學(xué)者(Billioud and Thoraval 2015)以“民間儒家”稱(chēng)之，包含兩個(gè)維度：一是指非官方的儒家活動(dòng)，這些活動(dòng)在國(guó)家行政機(jī)器之外開(kāi)展，但并不完全脫離國(guó)家力量的控制；一是指由普通人開(kāi)展的儒學(xué)活動(dòng)（第8頁(yè)）。對(duì)此，有兩點(diǎn)觀察值得注意。第一，當(dāng)儒家在社會(huì)大眾和日常生活復(fù)興時(shí)，它呈現(xiàn)出一種明顯的碎片化狀態(tài)，即儒家復(fù)興發(fā)生多樣而差異的領(lǐng)域里，這些領(lǐng)域之間缺乏明確聯(lián)系，儒家的某些部分猶如“補(bǔ)丁”一般被拼綴在不同領(lǐng)域的不同方面中(Billioud 2010)。第二，民間儒家的興起展現(xiàn)的是當(dāng)代儒家復(fù)興的“下行路線”，它與“上行路線”（即由政治和學(xué)術(shù)精英自上而下推動(dòng)的路線）之間絕非平行關(guān)系，而是相互交織、彼此纏結(jié)、競(jìng)相促進(jìn)、動(dòng)態(tài)發(fā)展。

上述變化是產(chǎn)生于二十世紀(jì)八十年代的“游魂說(shuō)”始料未及的，但在當(dāng)前的儒家研究中被忽視了。實(shí)際上，儒家在多重社會(huì)領(lǐng)域的復(fù)興客觀上給研究者們提出了一種新的要求，即應(yīng)該采取一種更具經(jīng)驗(yàn)取向的、跨學(xué)科的研究視野，通過(guò)扎實(shí)的田野工作和實(shí)地調(diào)查，探究當(dāng)代中國(guó)儒家復(fù)興的經(jīng)驗(yàn)事實(shí)，由此才有可能更好地理解正在涌現(xiàn)的當(dāng)下。鑒于此，本次特刊誠(chéng)邀有志之士，共同探討和反思當(dāng)代中國(guó)的儒家復(fù)興。本特刊特別歡迎基于經(jīng)驗(yàn)、調(diào)查和事實(shí)的研究。學(xué)科領(lǐng)域不限。本特刊希望聚焦正在涌現(xiàn)的、與儒家復(fù)興有關(guān)的社會(huì)經(jīng)驗(yàn)與事實(shí)，而非單純采用哲學(xué)化的分析視角；強(qiáng)調(diào)調(diào)查方法并對(duì)儒學(xué)復(fù)興現(xiàn)象做社會(huì)科學(xué)分析，而相對(duì)淡化對(duì)理論概念的哲學(xué)思辨。舉凡與當(dāng)代中國(guó)儒家復(fù)興有關(guān)的研究論文，皆在本特刊征稿范圍內(nèi)。具體主題包括但不限于：（1）儒家與教育；（2）修身實(shí)踐與個(gè)體生命；（3）儒家與宗教實(shí)踐；（4）儒家、祭祀與儀式；（5）儒家、政治與民族-國(guó)家；（6）儒家與商業(yè)社會(huì)；（7）儒家、家庭與性別；（8）儒家與社會(huì)行動(dòng)；（9）儒家與社交媒體；等等。

我們很高興地告知，本專(zhuān)題已經(jīng)被由《社會(huì)》雜志舉辦的“第十屆社會(huì)理論工作坊”接收，并被授權(quán)在2021年8月8日召開(kāi)專(zhuān)題研討會(huì)。我們將根據(jù)接收摘要的數(shù)量決定研討會(huì)的時(shí)長(zhǎng)（最長(zhǎng)可一天）。如果您的摘要被接收，我們將邀請(qǐng)您參加此次研討會(huì)。此外，我們還將視摘要征集情況決定是否增加專(zhuān)刊申請(qǐng)或書(shū)稿申請(qǐng)。

如果您有意為此次專(zhuān)題供稿，請(qǐng)于2021年6月10日之前發(fā)送中文或英文摘要（中文500字以?xún)?nèi)；英文300詞以?xún)?nèi)）到郵箱Canglong.Wang@hull.ac.uk。一旦您的摘要被接收，我們將會(huì)另行通知后續(xù)事宜。

Call for Papers

Rethinking Confucian revival in contemporary China through empirical perspectives

The modern fate of Confucianism is undergoing dramatic reversals over the past half a century. Yu Yingshi (1998) used the metaphor of “wandering soul” to describe the modern situation of Confucianism in the 1980s, implying the huge disruption of Confucianism from real life. Confucianism has undergone a long, still ongoing process of intellectual reconstruction since the beginning of the twentieth century, narrowing from a comprehensive system that covers politics, society, education, and culture to a philosophical/theoretical form of knowledge. This has resulted in Confucianism being separated from social practices and human relations and in its accused incompetency to provide spiritual sources for personal cultivation. However, since entering the 21^st century, Confucianism has increasingly displayed a different trend from the previous intellectualization process. It goes beyond the disciplinary boundaries and academic institutions, penetrates the folk society (minjian shehui), takes root in social groups and public domains, and becomes the spiritual source of individuals. Billioud and Thoraval (2015) indicated that “popular Confucianism” (minjian rujia) emerges rapidly in the past two decades, this term implying two dimensions: one refers to the unofficial, Confucian-related activities, which are carried out beyond the state administrative apparatus but are not completely out of its control; one refers to the Confucian activities promoted by ordinary people. In this regard, two observations deserve notice. First, the revival of popular Confucianism is displayed as a patchwork of fragmented and scattered activities, reappearing in differentiated and divided fields (Billioud 2010). Second, the rise of popular Confucianism shows the “downward route” (from bottom to top) of Confucian revival, which is by no means a parallel to the “upward route” (that from top to bottom, promoted by political and academic elites). Instead, the downward and upward routes are intertwined and interacting dynamically. 

However, the recent changes as described above have been largely underestimated in the scholarship of Confucian studies. The fact of Confucianism revival in diverse fields has posed an urgent call for empirical, interdisciplinary approaches to gain hands-on understanding of what is actually happening. Against this background, we invite proposals that address various aspects of Confucian revival in contemporary China. We particularly welcome empirical studies that pay attention to the evidence, facts and experience related to the revival of Confucianism. There is no limit to the fields of disciplines. Possible topics may include but are not limited to the following: (1) Confucianism and education; (2) Self-cultivation and individual life; (3) Confucianism and religious practice; (4) Confucianism and rituals; (5) Confucianism, politics and nation-state; (6) Confucianism and commercial society; (7) Confucianism, family and gender; (8) Confucianism and social action; (9) Confucianism and social media, among others. 

Depending on the number of received proposals, we will consider either a journal special issue or a format of an edited volume. We will aim at an IF journal or a recognizable publisher (for English articles), or a CSSCI journal (for Chinese articles). 

We are happy to inform you that this proposal has been accepted by the "Social Theory Workshop" hosted by the journal Shehui(Society) and has been approved to run the panel(s) on 8^th August 2021 for up to a whole day (via online approach). Accepted abstract authors will be kindly invited to attend the online panels to discuss their draft versions of submissions. 

Potential contributors are kindly invited to submit an abstract, either in Chinese or in English (max 300 words in English; 500 characters in Chinese), as well as a short bio/institutional affiliation/contact details, no later than June 10^th, 2021, to: Canglong.Wang@hull.ac.uk. Accepted proposals will be contacted afterwards regarding the details of full draft submission. 

Editor: 

Canglong Wang is a lecturer in Chinese Studies at the University of Hull, UK. His research explores the cultural, social and political implications for the revival of Confucian education in contemporary China. His publications appeared in both English and Chinese peer-reviewed journals. He is currently working on a monograph entitled Cultivating the Confucian individual: Subjectification and classical schooling in China. He can be contacted by the email address: Canglong.Wang@hull.ac.uk. 

References: 

Billioud, Sébastien. 2010. “Carrying the Confucian Torch to the Masses: The Challenge of Structuring the Confucian Revival in the People’s Republic of China.” Orien Extremus (49):201–24.

Billioud, Sébastien and Jo?l Thoraval. 2015. The Sage and the People: The Confucian Revival in China. New York: Oxford University Press.

Yu, Yingshi. 1998. Xiandai ruxue lun (On Modern Confucianism). Shanghai: Shanghai renmin chubanshe.